You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Influence of State Laws Mandating Reporting of Healthcare-Associated Infections: The Case of Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections
Amy L. Pakyz PharmD MS and Michael B. Edmond MD MPH MPA
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
Vol. 34, No. 8 (August 2013), pp. 780-784
Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/671280
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: State hospitals, Health legislation, Infections, Nonprofit hospitals, State legislation, Intensive care units, Health care industry, Hospital administration, Hospital units, State law
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Objective. To evaluate the impact of state laws on reporting of healthcare-associated infections on central line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates.Design. Retrospective, cross-sectional study.Methods. Hospital-level administrative and Hospital Compare data were collected on University HealthSystem Consortium hospitals. An ordered probit regression model assessed the association between state legislation and CLABSI standardized infection ratio (SIR). The main independent variable was a state legislation variable concerning 3 legal requirements (data submission, reporting of data to the public, inclusion of facility identifiers in public reports) and was coded for hospitals accordingly: located in a state that did not have CLABSI reporting, located in a state that had CLABSI reporting legislation and met 3 legal requirements, or located in a state that had CLABSI reporting but did not meet the 3 legal requirements. A secondary analysis ascertained whether the mean state SIR values differed among the 3 legislation groups.Results. There were 159 hospitals included; 92 were located in states that had CLABSI reporting and met 3 requirements, 33 were located in states that had reporting but did not meet the 3 requirements, and 34 were in states that had no legislation. There was no effect of state legislation group on CLABSI SIR. There were no significant differences in the mean state CLABSI SIRs among the legislation groups.Conclusions. In this sample of academic medical centers, there was no evidence of an effect of state HAI laws on CLABSI occurrence. The impact of state legislation may be lessened by other CLABSI prevention initiatives.
© 2013 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.