You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Deep Conventionalism about Evolutionary Groups
Matthew J. Barker and Joel D. Velasco
Philosophy of Science
Vol. 80, No. 5 (December 2013), pp. 971-982
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/673923
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Evolution, Species, Pluralist school, Population growth, Biological taxonomies, Conventionalism, Biological evolution, Phenotypic traits, Country music, Picnics
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
We reject a widespread objectivism about kinds of evolutionary groups in favor of a new conventionalism. Surprisingly, being any one kind of evolutionary group typically depends on which of many incompatible values are taken by suppressed variables. This novel pluralism underlies almost any single evolutionary group concept, unlike familiar pluralisms claiming that multiple concepts of certain sorts are legitimate. Consequently, we must help objective facts determine which candidate evolutionary groups satisfy the definition of a given evolutionary group concept, regardless of whether we also help determine the legitimacy of that concept’s applications.
Copyright 2013 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.