You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
When We Do (and Do Not) Have a Classical Arrow of Time
Bryan W. Roberts
Philosophy of Science
Vol. 80, No. 5 (December 2013), pp. 1112-1124
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/674001
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Trajectories, Velocity, Classical mechanics, Laws of Motion, Momentum, Mathematical functions, Newtonianism, Row transformations, Property law, Mathematical integrals
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
I point out that some common folk wisdom about time reversal invariance in classical mechanics is strictly incorrect, by showing some explicit examples in which classical time reversal invariance fails, even among conservative systems. I then show that there is nevertheless a broad class of familiar classical systems that are time reversal invariant.
Copyright 2013 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.