Your PDF has successfully downloaded.
You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Vol. 104, No. 4 (December 2013), pp. 773-776
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/674943
Page Count: 4
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Latin American literature, Sugars, Literary history, Diseases, Countries, Literary criticism, American studies, United States history, Nation building, Plant diseases
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
ABSTRACTThe “global turn” in the history of science offers new ways to think about how to do national and regional histories of science, in this case the history of science in Latin America. For example, it questions structuralist and diffusionist models of the spread of science and shows the often active role that people in Latin America (and the rest of the Global South) played in the construction of “universal” scientific knowledge. It suggests that even national or regional histories of science must be situated in a global context; all too often, such histories have treated global processes as a distant backdrop. At the same time, historians need to pay constant attention to the role of power in the construction of scientific knowledge. Finally, this essay highlights a methodological tool for writing globally inflected histories of science: the method of “following.”
© 2013 by The History of Science Society. All rights reserved.