You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Rejected, Shackled, and Alone: The Impact of Systemic Restricted Choice on Minority Consumers’ Construction of Self
Sterling A. Bone, Glenn L. Christensen and Jerome D. Williams
Journal of Consumer Research
Vol. 41, No. 2 (August 2014), pp. 451-474
Published by: Oxford University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/676689
Page Count: 24
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Hispanics, Self esteem, Bank loans, Self concept, Minority banks, White people, Consumer loans, Economic discrimination, Bachelors degrees, Academic degrees
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
This research investigates the experience of systemic restricted choice and its impact on self-concept among racial and ethnic minority consumers seeking financing. Choosing loans is an involved consumer choice journey, and encountering systemic, chronic, and uncontrollable restrictions on choice at any level of the goal/choice hierarchy limits and even prohibits minorities’ ability to make desired choices. Across a multimethod investigation, these three studies demonstrate that minorities experiencing systemic restricted choice endure deleterious impacts to self-concept, including framing the self as fettered, alone, discriminated, and subservient, as well as marked reductions in self-esteem, self-autonomy, and self-efficacy. Minority consumers also frame themselves as striving in a world of limited resources and fighting uphill, often losing battles. Juxtaposing the experiences of racial/ethnic minorities against the choice journeys of educationally and economically similar white consumers puts those minority experiences in sharp relief. The theoretical and transformative consumer research implications of these findings are discussed.
© 2014 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc.