Your PDF has successfully downloaded.
You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Getting Ahead of One’s Self?: The Common Culture of Immunology and Philosophy
Vol. 105, No. 3 (September 2014), pp. 606-616
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/678176
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Immunology, Autoimmunity, Metaphysics, Immune system, Immunity, Modern philosophy, Self, AIDS, Social theories, Cultural anthropology
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
ABSTRACTDuring the past thirty years, immunological metaphors, motifs, and models have come to shape much social theory and philosophy. Immunology, so it seems, often has served to naturalize claims about self, identity, and sovereignty—perhaps most prominently in Jacques Derrida’s later studies. Yet the immunological science that functions as “nature” in these social and philosophical arguments is derived from interwar and Cold War social theory and philosophy. Theoretical immunologists and social theorists knowingly participated in a common culture. Thus the “naturalistic fallacy” in this case might be reframed as an error of categorization: its conditions of possibility would require ceaseless effort to purify and separate out the categories of nature and culture. The problem—inasmuch as there is a problem—therefore is not so much the making of an appeal to nature as assuming privileged access to an independent, sovereign category called “nature.”
© 2014 by The History of Science Society. All rights reserved.