You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
This Number Just Feels Right: The Impact of Roundedness of Price Numbers on Product Evaluations
Monica Wadhwa and Kuangjie Zhang
Journal of Consumer Research
Vol. 41, No. 5 (February 2015), pp. 1172-1185
Published by: Oxford University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/678484
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Cognition, Prices, Shampoo, Consumer prices, Judgment, Binoculars, Weak arguments, Market prices, Calculators, Sensory perception
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
This research proposes that because rounded numbers are more fluently processed, rounded prices (e.g., $200.00) encourage reliance on feelings. In contrast, because nonrounded numbers are disfluently processed, nonrounded prices (e.g., $198.76) encourage reliance on cognition. Thus, rounded (nonrounded) prices lead to a subjective experience of “feeling right” when the purchase decision is driven by feelings (cognition). Further, this sense of feeling right resulting from the fit between the roundedness of the price number and the nature of decision context can make positive reactions toward the target product more positive and negative reactions more negative, a phenomenon referred to as the rounded price effect in the current research. Results from five studies provide converging evidence for the rounded price effect. Findings from the current research further show that merely priming participants with rounded (nonrounded) numbers in an unrelated context could also lead to the rounded price effect. Finally, this research provides process support by showing that the rounded price effect is mediated by a sense of feeling right. This is the first research examining the differential impact of roundedness of prices on product purchase decisions, based on whether the purchase decision is driven by feelings versus cognition.
© 2014 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc.