You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Children's Judgments of Inequitable Distributions That Conform to Gender Norms
Vol. 61, No. 3 (July 2015), pp. 319-344
Published by: Wayne State University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.61.3.0319
Page Count: 26
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Children, Child psychology, Age, Adults, Gender discrimination, Age groups, Reasoning, Sex linked differences, Fairness, Gender roles
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
To evaluate whether distributions by sex are judged to be unfair, children at ages 6, 8, and 10, and adults (N = 96), judged an authority distributing items to children by using different methods (i.e., randomly or by sex), types of items (i.e., related or unrelated to gender norms), and differences in the equivalency of the items (i.e., equivalent or unequal). Children often approved of equivalent distributions by sex and unequal distributions by sex when items were related to gender norms. The 6- and 8-year-olds, but not 10-year-olds and adults, perceived that everyone would agree to the method of distribution. Only adults were more critical of distributions by sex than random distributions.
© 2015 by Wayne State University Press