Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:

login

Log in through your institution.

Journal Article

Why Ecosystem-Based Management May Fail without Changes to Tool Development and Financing

Corrie Curtice, Daniel C. Dunn, Jason J. Roberts, Sarah D. Carr and Patrick N. Halpin
BioScience
Vol. 62, No. 5 (May 2012), pp. 508-515
DOI: 10.1525/bio.2012.62.5.13
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/bio.2012.62.5.13
Page Count: 8
Were these topics helpful?
See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!

Select the topics that are inaccurate.

Cancel
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
Why Ecosystem-Based Management May Fail without Changes to Tool Development and Financing
Preview not available

Abstract

Resource managers rely on tools to enact ecosystem-based management (EBM) principles and frequently express frustration at the difficulty of use and unreliability of available tools. EBM tool developers lack the consistent, long-term funding needed to develop high-quality tools. Through interviews, we determined several reasons for this funding problem including: (a) most EBM tools are developed by academics rather than software professionals and (b) most tools are offered at no cost. These factors create a double-edged sword for managers who cannot afford high license fees or to waste time with low-quality, unmaintained products. Without a fundamental shift in tool funding and development, many potentially useful tools will remain poorly implemented and underused. Without a significant increase in the number of high-quality EBM tools, governmental mandates to implement EBM will remain unfulfilled. This problem can be addressed if both developers and funders change the ways in which they seek and grant financial support.

Page Thumbnails

Part of Sustainability