Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Predicting Publication Success for Biologists

William F. Laurance, D. Carolina Useche, Susan G. Laurance and Corey J. A. Bradshaw
BioScience
Vol. 63, No. 10 (October 2013), pp. 817-823
DOI: 10.1525/bio.2013.63.10.9
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/bio.2013.63.10.9
Page Count: 7
  • Get Access
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Cite this Item
Item Type
Article
References
If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Predicting Publication Success for Biologists
Preview not available

Abstract

Can one foresee whether young scientists will publish successfully during their careers? For academic biologists on four continents, we evaluated the effects of gender, native language, prestige of the institution at which they received their PhD, the date of their first publication (relative to the year of PhD completion), and their pre-PhD publication record as potential indicators of long-term publication success (10 years post-PhD). Pre-PhD publication success was the strongest correlate of long-term success. Gender, language, and the date of first publication had ancillary roles, with native English speakers, males, and those who published earlier in their career having minor advantages. Once these aspects were accounted for, university prestige had almost no discernable effect. We suggest that early publication success is vital for aspiring young scientists and that one of the easiest ways to identify rising stars is simply to find those who have published early and often.

Page Thumbnails