You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Public Understanding of Synthetic Biology
Vol. 63, No. 2 (February 2013), pp. 79-89
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/bio.2013.63.2.4
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Synthetic biology, Focus groups, Biotechnology, Emerging technology, Technology, Agricultural biotechnology, Biomedical technology, Design engineering, Genetic engineering, Food movements
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
The objective of this article is not to draw exhaustive conclusions about public perceptions of synthetic biology but to provide readers with an integrated review of the findings from 4 years of quantitative and qualitative research conducted on this subject in the United States. US public perceptions toward synthetic biology are ambivalent. Members of the public show enthusiasm for synthetic biology applications when those applications are developed to address societal, medical, and sustainability needs, whereas engineering biology is seen as a potential concern if this research is done without investigations of its potential risks and long-term implications. Members of the public also support funding for research that leads to applications that actually meet social and sustainability goals. When it comes to oversight, their priorities are to promote transparency and accountability and to ensure a form of tailored governance in which diverse knowledge sources help address the uncertainty surrounding new technologies.
© 2013 by American Institute of Biological Sciences. All rights reserved. Request permission to photocopy or reproduce article content at the University of California Press’s Rights and Permissions Web site at http://www.ucpressjournals.com/reprintinfo.asp.