Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Public Understanding of Synthetic Biology

Eleonore Pauwels
BioScience
Vol. 63, No. 2 (February 2013), pp. 79-89
DOI: 10.1525/bio.2013.63.2.4
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/bio.2013.63.2.4
Page Count: 11
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Cite this Item
Item Type
Article
References
Public Understanding of Synthetic Biology
Preview not available

Abstract

The objective of this article is not to draw exhaustive conclusions about public perceptions of synthetic biology but to provide readers with an integrated review of the findings from 4 years of quantitative and qualitative research conducted on this subject in the United States. US public perceptions toward synthetic biology are ambivalent. Members of the public show enthusiasm for synthetic biology applications when those applications are developed to address societal, medical, and sustainability needs, whereas engineering biology is seen as a potential concern if this research is done without investigations of its potential risks and long-term implications. Members of the public also support funding for research that leads to applications that actually meet social and sustainability goals. When it comes to oversight, their priorities are to promote transparency and accountability and to ensure a form of tailored governance in which diverse knowledge sources help address the uncertainty surrounding new technologies.

Page Thumbnails