Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Expert Opinion on Climate Change and Threats to Biodiversity

Debra Javeline, Jessica J. Hellmann, Rodrigo Castro Cornejo and Gregory Shufeldt
BioScience
Vol. 63, No. 8 (August 2013), pp. 666-673
DOI: 10.1525/bio.2013.63.8.9
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/bio.2013.63.8.9
Page Count: 8
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Cite this Item
Item Type
Article
References
Expert Opinion on Climate Change and Threats to Biodiversity
Preview not available

Abstract

Considerable uncertainty surrounds projections of climate change and its ecological consequences. We surveyed 2329 environmental biologists and found that greater expertise is associated with projections of greater climatic change and more severe consequences. The opinions of scientists with greater expertise converge, and they expect larger temperature increases, higher percentages of species extinctions, and a high percentage of species’ ranges will change in response to climate change over the next 100 years. Importantly, even the highest of these estimates is at the lower bounds of many published projections of climate change and threats to biodiversity. These findings suggest that experts are relatively conservative and discerning about the magnitude of climate change and its biodiversity effects, but even their conservative estimates are substantial. We suggest that policymakers consult environmental biologists on emerging and controversial issues such as climate change and use transparent, standardized metrics of expertise when deciding which scientists to consult.

Page Thumbnails