Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

A Tale of Two Acts: Endangered Species Listing Practices in Canada and the United States

Robin S. Waples, Marta Nammack, Jean Fitts Cochrane and Jeffrey A. Hutchings
BioScience
Vol. 63, No. 9 (September 2013), pp. 723-734
DOI: 10.1525/bio.2013.63.9.8
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/bio.2013.63.9.8
Page Count: 12
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Cite this Item
Item Type
Article
References
A Tale of Two Acts: Endangered Species Listing Practices in Canada and the United States
Preview not available

Abstract

Canada’s Species at Risk Act (SARA) and the US Endangered Species Act (ESA) have adopted different approaches to achieve overlapping goals. We compare the ESA and SARA, focusing on the roles of science and policy in determining which species warrant legal protection. Our analysis suggests that each act could benefit from mimicking the strengths of the other, and both could be strengthened by greater clarity and transparency of listing determinations. A particular strength of SARA is that all evaluations of species’ status are conducted by a single national scientific body. The ESA does not involve a comparable national body but has more stringent legal deadlines for listing actions, and listing decisions cannot by law consider socioeconomic factors (as can occur under SARA). The conservation of biodiversity would be enhanced if both acts were complemented by additional programs focused on broader efforts that protect more species before individual intervention is needed.

Page Thumbnails