You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Phylogeny and Classification of Automolus Foliage-gleaners and Allies (Furnariidae) - Filogenia y Clasificación de Automolus y Géneros Relacionados (Aves: Furnariidae)
Santiago Claramunt, Elizabeth P. Derryberry, Carlos Daniel Cadena, Andrés M. Cuervo, Camilo Sanín and Robb T. Brumfield
Vol. 115, No. 2 (May 2013), pp. 375-385
Published by: American Ornithological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/cond.2013.110198
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Biological taxonomies, Genera, Taxa, Mitochondrial DNA, Plumage, Phylogenetics, Statistical discrepancies, Species, Monophyly, Datasets
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Abstract We investigate phylogenetic relationships among the foliage-gleaners of the genera Automolus, Hyloctistes, Hylocryptus, and Clibanornis (Furnariidae) by means of DNA sequences of mitochondrial and nuclear genes. The genus Automolus is not monophyletic because A. rubiginosus and A. rufipectus are more closely related to Hylocryptus and Clibanornis and because Hyloctistes is nested within the main Automolus clade. Hylocryptus erythrocephalus and H. rectirostris are not sister species; the former is part of the A. rubiginosus complex, whereas the latter is sister to Clibanornis dendrocolaptoides. Two species, A. infuscatus and A. rubiginosus, are not monophyletic, indicating the need for further taxonomic revision. On the basis of our phylogenetic analyses and of quantitative assessments of phenotypic variation, we propose a new classification for Automolus and allies, including the description of a new subgenus.
© 2013 by The Cooper Ornithological Society