Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Phylogeny and Classification of Automolus Foliage-gleaners and Allies (Furnariidae) - Filogenia y Clasificación de Automolus y Géneros Relacionados (Aves: Furnariidae)

Filogenia y Clasificación de Automolus y Géneros Relacionados (Aves: Furnariidae)
Santiago Claramunt, Elizabeth P. Derryberry, Carlos Daniel Cadena, Andrés M. Cuervo, Camilo Sanín and Robb T. Brumfield
The Condor
Vol. 115, No. 2 (May 2013), pp. 375-385
DOI: 10.1525/cond.2013.110198
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/cond.2013.110198
Page Count: 11
  • More info
  • Cite this Item
Item Type
Article
References
Phylogeny and Classification of Automolus Foliage-gleaners and Allies (Furnariidae) - Filogenia y Clasificación de Automolus y Géneros Relacionados (Aves: Furnariidae)
Preview not available

Abstract

Abstract We investigate phylogenetic relationships among the foliage-gleaners of the genera Automolus, Hyloctistes, Hylocryptus, and Clibanornis (Furnariidae) by means of DNA sequences of mitochondrial and nuclear genes. The genus Automolus is not monophyletic because A. rubiginosus and A. rufipectus are more closely related to Hylocryptus and Clibanornis and because Hyloctistes is nested within the main Automolus clade. Hylocryptus erythrocephalus and H. rectirostris are not sister species; the former is part of the A. rubiginosus complex, whereas the latter is sister to Clibanornis dendrocolaptoides. Two species, A. infuscatus and A. rubiginosus, are not monophyletic, indicating the need for further taxonomic revision. On the basis of our phylogenetic analyses and of quantitative assessments of phenotypic variation, we propose a new classification for Automolus and allies, including the description of a new subgenus.

Page Thumbnails