Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

A Needs Assessment to Build International Research Ethics Capacity

John E. Sidle, Edwin Were, Kara Wools-Kaloustian, Christine Chuani, Karen Salmon, William M. Tierney and Eric M. Meslin
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal
Vol. 1, No. 2 (June 2006), pp. 23-38
Published by: Sage Publications, Inc.
DOI: 10.1525/jer.2006.1.2.23
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/jer.2006.1.2.23
Page Count: 16
  • Download ($40.00)
  • Cite this Item
Item Type
Article
References
If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
A Needs Assessment to Build International Research Ethics Capacity
Preview not available

Abstract

INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATORS IN BIOMEDICAL sciences face ethical challenges in the design, review, and conduct of research. Challenges include differences in research ethics capacity, cultural differences in interpretation and application of ethical principles, and cooperation between ethics review boards at collaborating institutions. Indiana University School of Medicine (Indianapolis, USA) and Moi University Faculty of Health Sciences (Eldoret, Kenya) developed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to establish greater cooperation between their ethics review boards, followed by a joint needs assessment to assess barriers to implementing the MOU. Focus groups and interviews at each institution revealed that while each side verbalized understanding and respect for the other's culture, there were misunderstandings deeply rooted in each culture that could potentially derail the collaboration. Although the participants at each university agreed on the major principles and issues in research ethics and on the importance attributed to them, a more in-depth evaluation of the responses revealed important differences. Methods to address these misunderstandings are outlined in the recommended Best Practices.

Page Thumbnails