You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:


Log in through your institution.

Journal Article

Silence in the Courtroom

Andrew Green
Law and Literature
Vol. 24, No. 1, Silence (Spring 2012), pp. 80-101
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. on behalf of the Cardozo School of Law
DOI: 10.1525/lal.2012.24.1.80
Stable URL:
Page Count: 22
Were these topics helpful?
See something inaccurate? Let us know!

Select the topics that are inaccurate.

  • Download ($46.00)
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
Silence in the Courtroom
Preview not available


Concentrating on the trials of Thomas Cooper in 1800 and Eugene Debs in 1918, this article looks at how sedition laws and other legal restrictions on free speech result in courtroom trials that produce a counteractive effect. Each of these people contravened and challenged existing censorship laws designed to subdue government criticism. The resulting show trials gave voice to the individuals and causes that democratic governments attempted to stifle. This article explores the evolving legal response to the irony of how a democracy, as a government where all voices are given input, creates a legal framework to legitimize the suppression of these voices.

Page Thumbnails