You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
G. H. Mead's Social Behaviorism vs. The Astructural Bias of Symbolic Interactionism
Michael Wood and Mark L. Wardell
Vol. 6, No. 1 (Spring 1983), pp. 85-96
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/si.1918.104.22.168
Page Count: 12
Preview not available
Symbolic inleractionism has been criticized for having an astructural bias. This paper presents a response to that criticism by examining the ontological stance contained in Mead's social behaviorism and contrasting it with the ontological stance of symbolic interactionism's chief architect, Herbert Blumer. Mead's social behaviorism is shown to be a nondualist philosophy of conduct based solidly on conceptions of the human community and of individual conduct as organized on the basis of social acts–a view not shared by Blumer.
Symbolic Interaction © 1983 Wiley