You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Stigmatizing Indebtedness: Implications for Labeling Theory
Terrell A. Hayes
Vol. 23, No. 1 (2000), pp. 29-46
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/si.2000.23.1.29
Page Count: 18
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Shame, Product labeling, Men, Debt, Meetings, Debtors, Financial management, Social interaction, Attachment behavior, Marriage
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Given the low visibility of indebtedness and normative expectations regarding the use of credit and the accrual of debt, questions arise as to whether or not being unable to manage one's finances responsibly should necessarily lead a person to feel shame. Findings from a study, based on forty-six interviews with members of Debtors Anonymous (DA), exploring the relevance of labeling theory to individual perceptions of one's indebtedness as shameful are presented. Shame is revealed to be a key element in the labeling process. How stigmatized labels arise in interaction, how such labels affect a person's thoughts, feelings, and actions, and how gender affects labeling experiences are discussed. Insights into the interconnections between labeling and shame show the labeling process to be considerably more complex than suggested in the original version of labeling theory.
Symbolic Interaction © 2000 Wiley