You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
Residual Categories and Disciplinary Knowledge: Personal Identity in Sociological and Forensic Investigations
Vol. 26, No. 4 (Fall 2003), pp. 515-529
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/si.2003.26.4.515
Page Count: 15
Preview not available
A central feature of the development of sociological knowledge is the formulation and use of “descriptive frames of reference” within which theoretical and empirical work may be critically assessed. This article considers the way in which one such frame of reference—that developed by Erving Goffman to represent the variety of human science understandings of the nature of identity in social interaction—distinguished between “personal,” “social,” and “self” identity. The relative neglect of the first of these three categorizations is noted. Following Garfinkel's suggestions for the “respecification” of social analysis, this article suggests the usefulness of an approach to the neglected issue of personal identity that suspends theoretical stipulation about an abstract noun in favor of an ethnographic study of a particular occupational group—forensic investigators—for whom an orientation to personal identities is a recurrent accountable practical concern.
Symbolic Interaction © 2003 Wiley