You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Is Work Bad for Health? The Role of Constraint versus Choice
Andrea Bassanini and Eve Caroli
Annals of Economics and Statistics
No. 119/120, SPECIAL ISSUE ON HEALTH AND LABOUR ECONOMICS (December 2015), pp. 13-37
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.15609/annaeconstat2009.119-120.13
Page Count: 25
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Retirement, Unemployment, Job loss, Employment, Economic statistics, Health benefits, Mortality, Age, Mental health, Health care economics
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
This paper reviews the literature on the impact of work on health. We consider work along two dimensions: (i) the intensive margin, i.e. how many hours an individual works when employed and (ii) the extensive margin, i.e. whether an individual is in employment or not. We show that most of the evidence on the negative health impact of work found in the literature is based on situations in which workers have essentially no control (no choice) over the amount of work they provide. In essence, what is detrimental to health is not so much work per se as much as the gap which may exist between the actual and the desired amount of work, both at the intensive and extensive margins. JEL: I10, I31, J22, J28. / KEY WORDS: Health, Work, Retirement, Hours Worked, Job Loss, Individual Choice.
© ANNALS OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS