Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Securing the Global City: Crime, Consulting, Risk, and Ratings in the Production of Urban Space

Katharyne Mitchell and Katherine Beckett
Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies
Vol. 15, No. 1 (Winter 2008), pp. 75-99
Published by: Indiana University Press
DOI: 10.2979/gls.2008.15.1.75
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/gls.2008.15.1.75
Page Count: 26
  • Download ($15.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Item Type
Article
References
If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Securing the Global City: Crime, Consulting, Risk, and Ratings in the Production of Urban Space
Preview not available

Abstract

Abstract The last decade has witnessed the rise of private transnational institutions that increasingly influence the organization and management of urban space. Two institutions are especially powerful in this regard: bond-rating agencies and global security firms. Bolstered by a discourse of risk and the need to securitize cities, these institutions have garnered enormous amounts of power with respect to urban social and spatial control. They are implicated in the imprisonment and displacement of marginalized populations, the intensification of gentrification, and general shifts in municipal funding priorities. The authors illustrate these themes through a case study of New York City, followed by an example of the transnational movement of these forces and their exportation to sites such as Mexico City.

Page Thumbnails