You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
A Critique of Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy
Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society
Vol. 45, No. 1 (Winter 2009), pp. 50-54
Published by: Indiana University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/tra.2009.45.1.50
Page Count: 5
Preview not available
Abstract Robert B. Talisse's A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy is a genuine tour de force. His aim is both to defend a particular view of pragmatism originating with the work of Charles Sanders Peirce and, at the same time, argue in favour of a new view of deliberative democracy developed from Talisse's Peircean pragmatism. The result is a stunning achievement with real persuasive power. In this article, I will focus on one worry, namely, that the picture of democracy on offer is incomplete. While Talisse correctly argues that democracy is about more than elections, democracy is also about more than deliberation between citizens. Talisse's deliberative democracy is problematic to the degree its view of deliberation fails to account for democracy. If my analysis is correct, then I do not aim to demonstrate that Talisse's Peircean pragmatism is incorrect, only incomplete. Thus, the hope of this article is to help develop this pragmatism further.
© 2008 Charles S. Peirce Society