If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Catalyzing Prufrock

Nicholas B. Mayer
Journal of Modern Literature
Vol. 34, No. 3 (Spring 2011), pp. 182-198
Published by: Indiana University Press
DOI: 10.2979/jmodelite.34.3.182
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/jmodelite.34.3.182
Page Count: 17
  • Download PDF
  • Cite this Item

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Catalyzing Prufrock
Preview not available

Abstract

Scant critical attention has hitherto been paid to T.S. Eliot's ““The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock”” in relation to the excised ““Prufrock's Pervigilium”” section preserved in his ““March Hare”” Notebook and why Eliot might have deleted it. Reading the ““Pervigilium”” back into ““Prufrock,”” this article argues that ““Prufrock”” sings of its own making and that of its poet's consciousness in the ““Pervigilium”” section. In this way, the poem anticipates Eliot's depersonalization (or catalysis) theory of poetic creation in ““Tradition and the Individual Talent,”” where the deletion of the ““Pervigilium”” is prescribed. F.H. Bradley's Appearance and Reality and Walter Pater's Marius the Epicurean, meanwhile, emerge as important influences on Eliot's depersonalization theory and the dissociated poetic consciousness of ““Prufrock.”” As a result of the latter influence, this article also contributes to the ongoing examination of Eliot's indebtedness to the writers in Decadent England.

Page Thumbnails