You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
Consonances Between Liberalism and Pragmatism
Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society
Vol. 48, No. 2 (Spring 2012), pp. 141-168
Published by: Indiana University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.48.2.141
Page Count: 28
Preview not available
Abstract This paper is an attempt to identify certain consonances between contemporary liberalism and classical pragmatism. I first analyze four of the most trenchant criticisms of classical liberalism presented by pragmatist figures such as James, Peirce, Dewey, Addams, and Hocking: that liberalism overemphasizes negative liberty, that it is overly individualistic, that its pluralism is suspect, that it is overly abstract. I then argue that these deficits of liberalism in its historical incarnations are being addressed by contemporary liberals. Contemporary liberals, I show, have taken on board a surprising number of classical pragmatist insights and have responded to a surprising number of classical pragmatist criticisms. I thus argue that both contemporary pragmatism and contemporary liberalism have much to gain by joining forces.
© 2012 Charles S. Peirce Society