You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
In Pursuit of Conservative Reform: Social Darwinism, the Agricultural Ladder, and the Lessons of European Tenancy
Joshua M. Nygren
Vol. 89, No. 1 (Winter 2015), pp. 75-101
Published by: Agricultural History Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3098/ah.2015.089.1.75
Page Count: 27
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Farm economics, Agricultural land, Tenancy, Farmers, Crops, Industrial agriculture, Land economics, Capitalism, Tenants, Farms
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
This article explores the intellectual foundations of the “agricultural ladder” metaphor by examining the ideologies and experiences of the two economists—Henry C. Taylor and Richard T. Ely—who inserted the concept into academic discourse. It argues that the agricultural ladder was a product of Taylor and Ely's mutual pursuit of conservative reform, an attempt to achieve the common good of widespread landownership without revolutionary disruptions to the status quo. Acting on their social Darwinist beliefs that societies evolved through successive stages of social and economic development, the economists crossed the Atlantic to study European land tenancy. These studies reinforced Taylor and Ely's demand for slow, measured tenure reform—an essential characteristic of the agricultural ladder. This resistance to rapid change ultimately naturalized the agricultural capitalism and racialized tenancy that prevented poorer farmers from owning their own farms. The agricultural ladder recast the prototypical farmer as well capitalized, highly efficient, and white.
© the Agricultural History Society, 2015