You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Men Out of Time: Confronting History and Myth
Michael A. McDonnell
The William and Mary Quarterly
Vol. 68, No. 4 (October 2011), pp. 644-648
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5309/willmaryquar.68.4.0644
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Political revolutions, American Revolution, United States history, Native Americans, Politicians, Political history, Parliamentary debate, State politics, Economic motivation, Creation myths
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Staughton Lynd and David Waldstreicher attempt to cut across old divisions in the historiography of the American Revolution between whigs and progressives (or neo-whigs and neo-progressives) to argue that the Revolution was a colonial independence movement and the reasons for it were fundamentally economic. Robert G. Parkinson, Jack Rakove, Barbara Clark Smith, and Michael A. McDonnell respond to the essay; the Forum concludes with Lynd and Waldstreicher’s reply.
Copyright 2011 Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture