You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
The Unexamined Life and Surface Pleasures
John J. Stuhr
The Journal of Speculative Philosophy
Vol. 30, No. 2 (2016), pp. 163-174
Published by: Penn State University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/jspecphil.30.2.0163
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Self knowledge, Pleasure, Wisdom, Self examination, Examined life, Socratic philosophy, Nietzschean philosophy, Ontology, Happiness, Pragmatism
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
In this article, I begin by examining critically the Socratic claim that the unexamined life is not worth living. I identify three clusters of problems with this claim. I then consider the consequences of these problems by contemplating a different view of the relation of self-knowledge to the good life. For purposes of illustration, I draw on the film version of the well-known novel Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil. In particular, I consider the significance and the limits of a central idea in this film—the notion of an overpaint (literally a painting that has been painted over) and the claim that not knowing what is beneath the overpaint can be enjoyable. I develop this idea with reference to the philosophies of William James and Gilles Deleuze and conclude by describing the ways in which this view reorients the practice of philosophy from wisdom (sophia) to practical intelligence (freeness).
Copyright © 2016 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.