You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
The Politics of Memory in a Divided Society: A Comparison of Post-Franco Spain and Post-Soviet Ukraine
Vol. 70, No. 1 (SPRING 2011), pp. 137-164
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5612/slavicreview.70.1.0137
Page Count: 28
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Memory, Narrative history, Countries, History instruction, Civil wars, Laws of war, Civil law, Criminal law, Democracy, Nationalism
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Abstract Through a comparison of post-Franco Spain and post-Soviet Ukraine, Oxana Shevel examines state responses to the challenge of dealing with divided historical memory. Both countries embarked on the transition from authoritarian rule divided by the memory of the recent past, but each dealt with this similar challenge very differently. This article discusses Spain’s “democratization of memory” policy centered on the state’s refusal to define a common historical memory for the society as a whole and on the official recognition of the multiplicity of “personal and family” memories and examines why no comparable policy has emerged in Ukraine so far. Shevel considers the potential applicability of the Spanish solution to Ukraine in light of both social realities and theories of nation building, in particular the debate over whether national unity necessitates a cultural nation and shared collective memory, or whether unity in a democracy can be built on other foundations.
Copyright 2011 Association for Slavic East European and Eurasian Studies