You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Burghers versus Bureaucrats: Enlightened Centralism, the Royal Towns, and the Case of the Propinacja Law in Poland-Lithuania, 1776–1793
Curtis G. Murphy
Vol. 71, No. 2 (SUMMER 2012), pp. 385-409
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5612/slavicreview.71.2.0385
Page Count: 25
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Towns, Police, Municipal governments, Parliaments, Law reform, Government reform, Auctions, Taxes, Complaining, Jewish culture
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
In the eighteenth-century, European rulers embraced a common policy of enlightened centralism aimed at undermining the prerogatives of local self-government, a trend that even reached the decentralized Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. In this article, Curtis G. Murphy investigates an example of an Enlightenment centralist policy that failed. A new reformist king sought to convert the burghers’ right to produce alcohol, known as propinacja, into a state-controlled monopoly, but the effort produced only chaos and the diminishment of self-government. Contrary to the center’s complaint that insufficient force undermined a beneficial effort, Murphy argues that the law failed because the priorities of the locals did not align with the government’s goals and the habits of self-government clashed with the bureaucratic methods of enlightened centralism. Historians of Poland have often praised the centralizing reforms of the late-eighteenth century, but the case of the propinacja law questions whether such efforts justified the costs of destroying self-government in the towns.
Copyright 2012 Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies, Inc.