You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Methodology and Moral Education
Oxford Review of Education
Vol. 26, No. 2 (Jun., 2000), pp. 255-262
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1050839
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Ethical instruction, Morality, Medical practice, Empiricism, Moral particularism, Mental health, Children, Government initiatives, Literature, Values education
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
A case is argued for a certain procedure for moral education or 'value education'. The procedure begins by (1) categorising or defining the area and then (2) establishing what must logically count as 'a good performance' within it; thereafter we should devise practical assessment-methods (3), experiments in methods of moral education (4), and hence (5) be able to offer practical recommendations. The chief obstacle to progress is a descriptive theory of morality, which bases moral education on a prior set of substantive values: that is no logical basis for any form of thought, and anyway pupils are bound to challenge them. We need rather to work out, under (1) and (2), what counts as valid moral reasoning and what items of equipment the morally educated person needs: empirical research and practical methods must follow from that.
Oxford Review of Education © 2000 Taylor & Francis, Ltd.