Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:

login

Log in through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Journal Article

Evidence. Witness Not Allowed to Introduce Secondary Evidence after Having Fraudulently Destroyed the Primary Evidence

Virginia Law Review
Vol. 34, No. 5 (Jul., 1948), pp. 607-608
Published by: Virginia Law Review
DOI: 10.2307/1069271
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1069271
Page Count: 2

You can always find the topics here!

Topics: Best evidence rule, Legal evidence, Memoranda, Writing, Police, Software applications
Were these topics helpful?
See something inaccurate? Let us know!

Select the topics that are inaccurate.

Cancel
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Preview not available

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
607
    607
  • Thumbnail: Page 
608
    608