Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Impossibility of Performance, as an Excuse for Breach of Contract

Frederic C. Woodward
Columbia Law Review
Vol. 1, No. 8 (Dec., 1901), pp. 529-541
DOI: 10.2307/1109204
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1109204
Page Count: 13
Subjects: Law
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
Impossibility of Performance, as an Excuse for Breach of Contract
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 25 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    I65 N. Y. 247
  • 2
    15Harv. L. Rev., note on p. 63
  • 3
    Aleyn, 26 (1178)
  • 1
    Anson on Contracts, Ninth Edition, pp. 333-4
  • 2
    Supra
  • 3
    1Q. B. D.258
  • 1
    149 N. Y. 489
  • 1
    Lorillard v. Clyde, 142 N. Y. 456
  • 1
    47 N. Y. 62
  • 1
    3 B. & S. 826
  • 2
    Supra
  • 3
    54 Pa. St. 29I
  • 1
    Supra
  • 2
    Supra
  • 1
    6o N. Y. 487
  • 1
    1Q. B. D.544
  • 1
    upra
  • 2
    127 N. Y. 500
  • 3
    50 Minn. 280
  • 4
    Sufira
  • 1
    [1899] 1Q. B. D.439
  • 2
    43 Me. 463
  • 3
    Walsh v. Fisher, 102 Wis. 172
  • 1
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Dewey v. Union School District, 43 Mich. 480
    • McKay v. Barnett, 21 Utah, 239
  • 2
    This reference contains 6 citations:
    • Nicol v. Fitch, XI 5 Mich. X5
    • Board of Education v. Townsend, 63 Ohio St. 514
    • Hall v. School District, 24 Mo. App. 213
    • Herter v. Mullen, 159 N. Y. 44
    • Shear v. Wright, 6o Mich. 159
    • Allen v. Baker, 86 N. C. 91