Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Conditions Precedent and the Statute of Limitations

Columbia Law Review
Vol. 13, No. 4 (Apr., 1913), pp. 338-340
DOI: 10.2307/1110443
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1110443
Page Count: 3
Subjects: Law
Find more content in these subjects: Law
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Page Thumbnails

Notes and References

This item contains 18 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    This reference contains 5 citations:
    • Fernekes & Bros. v. Case (i&38) 75 Ia. 152
    • Sweet v. Electric Liglht Co. (i896) 97 Tenn. 252
    • United States v. Amer. Lumber Co. (i898) 85 Fed. 827
    • The Louisiana Civil Code, §H 35I8, 3551
    • Blume v. New Orleans (I9oI) 104 La. 345
  • 2
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • 2I Jac. I c. i6, 7 Stat. at Large 273-4
    • § 405, New York Code of Civil Procedure
  • 3
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Woods v. Houghton (Mass. I854) i Gray 580
    • L. R., M. R. & T. Ry. v. Manees (I887) 49 Ark. 248
    • Matthews v. Phillips (1708) 2 Salk. 424
  • 4
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Ball v. Biggam (I897) 6 Kan. App. 42
    • Harris v. Dennis (Pa. 18I4) i Serg. & R. 236
  • 5
    Railway Co. v. Bemis (igoi) 64 Oh. St. 26.
  • 6
    Smith v. McNeal (0883) iog U. S. 426.
  • 7
    note 2 siupra.
  • 8
    This reference contains 5 citations:
    • Reining v. Buffalo (I886) 102 N. Y. 308
    • Curry v. Buffalo (i892) I35 N. Y. 366
    • McKnight v. New York (i906) i86 N. Y. 35
    • Winter v. Niagara Falls (N. Y. 1907) i19 App. Div. 586
    • Norton v. The Mayor etc. (N. Y. I896) i6 Misc. 303
  • 9
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Wood, Limitations, (3rd ed.) § 42
    • conttra, Miller v. Ins. Co. (i898) 54 Neb. 12I
  • 10
    This reference contains 6 citations:
    • Riddlesbarger v. Hartford Ins. Co. (I868) 7 Wall. 386
    • McElrov v. Ins. Co. (I892) 48 Kan. 200
    • Matthewvs v. Amer. Centr. Ins. Co. (N. Y. i896) 9 App. Div. 339
    • Gough v. McFall (N. Y. 1898) 3I App. Div. 578
    • Semmes v. Ins. Co. (0871) 13 Wall. i58
    • Peoria etc. Ins. Co. v. Hall (I864) 12 Mich. 202
  • 11
    Titus v. Poole (i895) I45 N. Y. 414.
  • 12
    Hamilton v. Ins. Co. (I885) I56 N. Y. 327
  • 13
    This reference contains 6 citations:
    • § 40I of the New York Code of Civil Pro- cedure qualifies § I758
    • Ackerman v. Ackerman (19IO) 200 N. Y. 72
    • § i822, Hayden v. Pierce (I895) i4 N. Y. 512
    • § I596, Wetyen v. Fick (0904) I78 N. Y. 223
    • § 405 qualifies § 1822, Titus v. Poole supra
    • Cough v. McFall supra
  • 14
    This reference contains 6 citations:
    • Conolly v. Hyams (I903) I76 N. Y. 403
    • Seaton v. Hixon (i886) 35 Kan. 663
    • McElroy v. Ins. Co. stupra
    • conttra, Hammond v. Shephard (N. Y. i88) So Hun 3i8
    • Colell v. D. L. & W. R. R. Co. (N. Y. I903) 8o App. Div. 342
    • Cavanagh v. Ocean Steam Nav. Co. (i89o) I3 N. Y. Supp. 540
  • 15
    Hayden v. Pierce sitpra.
  • 16
    Hamilton v. Ins. Co. supra.
  • 17
    Conolly v. Hyams sufpra.
  • 18
    Bellinger v. Ins. Co. (N. Y. igo6) 5I Misc. 463.