Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Right to Solicit Customers of the Old Firm as Affected by a Sale of the Good Will

Columbia Law Review
Vol. 10, No. 7 (Nov., 1910), pp. 649-652
DOI: 10.2307/1110985
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1110985
Page Count: 4
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 14 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    Ro,well v. Rowell (1904) 122 Wis. I
  • 2
    This reference contains 8 citations:
    • Bell v. Ellis (867) 33 Cal. 620
    • Tennant v. Dunlop (i899) 97 Va. 234
    • Williams v. Wilson (N. Y. i846) 4 Sand. Ch. 379
    • Matter of Silkman (N. Y. I907) I2I App. Div. 202
    • People ex rel. A. J. Johnson Co. v. Roberts (i899) i59 N. Y. 70
    • It re Randall's estate (i889) 8 N. Y. Supp. 653
    • Smith v. Everitt (1859) 27 Beav. 46
    • 8COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW56
  • 3
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Slater v. Slater (I903) I75 N. Y. I43
    • Levy v. Walker (I878) L. R. io Ch. Div. 436
    • Adams v. Adams (N. Y. I879) 7 Abb. N. C. 22
    • Vonderbank v. Schmitt (La. 1892) 15L. R. A.462 and note
  • 4
    Merry v. Hoops (I888) iii N. Y. 4I5
  • 5
    This reference contains 5 citations:
    • Churton v. Douglas (N. Y. I859) Johns Ch. i74
    • Brass and Iron Works v. Payne (Ohio 1893) 19L. R. A.82
    • Fish Bros. Wagon Co. v. Fish (Wis. 1892) 16L. R. A.453
    • Myers v Kalamazoo Buggy Co. (I884) 54 MIich. 2I5
    • Smith v. Cooper (N. Y. I877) 5 Abb. N. C. 274
  • 6
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Smith v. Gibbs (0862) 44 N. H. 335
    • Cottrell v. Babcock Printing Press Co. (I886) 54 Conn. I22
    • Williams v. Farrand (i89I) 88 Mlich. 473
  • 7
    This reference contains 12 citations:
    • Trego v. Hunt L. R. [i896] A. C. 7
    • Labouchere v. Dawson (1871) L. R. 13 Eq. 322
    • Leggett v. Barrett ('880) L. R. Ij Ch. Div. 306
    • Zanturjian v. Boornazian (I9o3) 25 R. I. i5r
    • Curl Bros. v. Webster L. R. [1904] 1 Ch. 685
    • Burckhardt v. Burckhardt (IS80) 36 Ohio St. 26I
    • Burdick Part- nership 381
    • White v. Jones (N. Y. i863) i Rob. 321
    • Old Corner Book Store v. Upham (igo7) I94 Mass. ioi
    • Gordon v. Knott (I9o8) I9 lVfass. I73
    • Munsey v. Butter- field (i882) 133 Mass. 492
    • Dwight v. Hamilton (1873) I13 Mass. I75
  • 8
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Story, Partnership § 99
    • Collyer, Partnership § I6r
    • Lobeck v. Lee- Clarke-Andereesen Hardware Co. (Neb. 1893) 23L. R. A.195
  • 9
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Hegeman & Co. v. JHegeman (N. Y. iS8o) 8 Daly i
    • Hudson v. Osborne (1870) 39L. J. Ch. N. S. 79
    • Snyder Mfg. Co. v. Snyder (Ohio 1896) 31 L. R. A.657
  • 10
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Walker v. Mottram (1881) L. R.19 Ch. Div. 355
    • Griffith v. Kirley (1905) i89 Mass. 522
    • Dawson v. Beeson (1882) L. R.22 Ch. Div. 504
  • 11
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Jennings v. Jennings L. R. [1898] 1 Ch. 378
    • Smith v. Gibbs sutpra
    • Labouchere v. Dawson sutpra
    • Knoedler v. Glaenzer (1893) 55 Fed. 895
  • 12
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Leggett v. Barrett (i88o) L. RP IS Ch. Div. 306
    • Gillingham v. Beddowv, L. R. [1900] 2 Ch. 2
  • 13
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • li re David & Matthews L. R. [I899] I Ch. 378
    • Jennings v. Jennings supra
  • 14
    Hutchinson v. Nay (1904) I87 Mass. 262