Consent Decrees

Columbia Law Review
Vol. 22, No. 4 (Apr., 1922), pp. 344-348
DOI: 10.2307/1111304
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1111304
Page Count: 5
  • Download PDF
  • Cite this Item

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Consent Decrees
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 37 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    typical consent decree is in New England Mortgage Co. v. Tarver, etc. Co. (C. C. A. 1894) 60 Fed. 660.
  • 2
    First Nat. Bantk, etc. v. Northwesternt Water, etc. Co. (Iowa 1898) 74 N. W. 772.
  • 3
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Colultas v. Greeni (1867) 43 Ill. 477
    • Fletcher v. Holmes (1865) 25 Ind. 458.
  • 5a
    letter dated Feb. 25, 1922, printed in (1922) Senate Doc. 145
  • 6
    26 Stat. § 4, 209, U. S. Comp. Stat. (1916) §§ 8823, 8835.
  • 7
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Attorney Getteral v. Fiftsinmmions (Ark. 1896) 1 Ames, Cases in Eq2uity Jutris- prude7ce (1904) 622
    • (1917) 17COLUMBIA LAW REV.707.
  • 8
    (1917) 17COLUMBIA LAW REV.407.
  • 9
    Kelley v. Town of Milan (C. C. A. 1884) 21 Fed. 842.
  • 10
    Texas, etc. Ry v. Sotuthernt Pac. Ry. (1890) 137 U. S. 48, 11 Sup. Ct. 10.
  • 11
    This reference contains 7 citations:
    • Parkhurst v. Rochester L. Nl. Co. (1892) 65 Hun 489, 20 N. Y. Supp. 395
    • oad District No. 6 v. McKintey (Ill. 1921) 132 N. E. 529
    • Plano Alfg. Co. v. Rasey (1887) 69 Wis. 246, 34 N. W. 85.
    • (1915) 15COLUMBIA LAW REV.106.
    • Christensen v. Peo- ple (1904) 114 Ill. App. 40, aff'd (1905) 216 Ill. 354, 75 N. E. 108 (reversible)
    • In re Hall (1862) 10 Mich. 210 (void)
    • Flower v. MacGinziss (C. C. A. 1901) 112 Fed. 377 (void).
  • 12
    Roenzier v. Newnan (C. C. 1886) 26 Fed. 332, 334.
  • 13
    In; re Estate of Hentry Schiintheit (Probate Ct. of Kalamazoo, Mich. 1919)
  • 14
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Hohenadel v. Steele (1908) 237 III. 229, 86 N. E. 717
    • Mylliuts v. Smith (1903) 53 W. Va. 173, 44 S. W. 542
    • Driver v. Wood (1901) 114 Ga. 296, 40 S. E. 257.
  • 15
    Schermerhornt v. Mahaffle (1886) 34 Kan. 108, 8 Pac. 199.
  • 16
    Ftlto,s Imv. Co. v. Dorsey (C. C. A. 1915) 220 Fed. 298.
  • 17
    Farmners & Merchantts Batnk, etc. v. Arizonia Mutual, etc. Ass'n (C. C. A. 1915) 220 Fed. 1.
  • 18
    cases sutpra, footnotes 15
  • 19
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Adler v. Vank Kirk Lanzd, etc. Co. (1897) 114 Ala. 551, 21 So. 490
    • WVebb v. Webb (1676) 3 Swans. 658.
  • 20
    Schm7zidt v. Oregont Gold Min. Co. (1895) 28 Ore. 9, 40 Pac. 406, 1014.
  • 21
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • The Alcornt County v. Tutscumlbia, etc. (1912) 102 Miss. 401, 59 So. 798
    • litgles v. Bryatnt (1898) 117 Mich. 113, 75 N. W. 442.
  • 22
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • McGraw v. Traders Nat. Banik (1908) 64 W. Va. 509, 63 S. E. 398
    • Tltonzip- son v. Maxwell, etc. Co. (1897) 168 U. S. 451, 18 Sup. Ct. 121.
  • 23
    Monell v. Lawrence (N. Y. 1815) 12 Johns. 521, 534.
  • 24
    Hews v. Hews (1906) 145 Mich. 247, 108 N. W. 694.
  • 25
    Lawrem2ce Mfg. Co. v. Jamsesville CottonzA Mills (1891) 138 U. S. 552, 11 Sup. Ct. 402.
  • 26
    Clark v. Turnbutll (1884) 47N. J. L.265.
  • 27
    An4dersot v. Sntyder (1883) 21 W. Va. 632.
  • 28
    Lamib v. Gatlint (N. C. 1838) 2 Dev. & Batt. Eq. 37.
  • 29
    Thompson v. Maxwell (1877) 95 U. S. 391.
  • 30
    Lee v. Lee (1884) 77 Ala. 412.
  • 31
    sutpra, footnote 30 for a similar situation.
  • 32
    Nashville Ry. v. Utited States (1885) 113 U. S. 261, 5 Sup. Ct. 460.
  • 33
    Wadhaims V. Gay (1874) 73 Ill. 415.
  • 34
    supra, footnote 25.
  • 35
    Edwards v. Turnter (Tenn. Ch. 1897) 47 S. W. 144.
  • 36
    Moitypenty v Montypeity (1916) 171 App., Div. 134, 135, 157 N. Y. Supp. 1.
  • 37
    Commonwealth v. Horton; (Mass. 1829) 9 Pick. 206.
  • 39
    (1921) COLUMBIA LAW REV.599.