Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Liability of a Telegraph Company for Transmitting a Defamatory Message. II Privilege

Young B. Smith
Columbia Law Review
Vol. 20, No. 4 (Apr., 1920), pp. 369-393
DOI: 10.2307/1111981
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1111981
Page Count: 25
Subjects: Law
Find more content in these subjects: Law
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 80 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    This reference contains 5 citations:
    • Yates v. Lansing (N. Y. 1810) 5 Johns. 282
    • (N. Y. 1811) 9 Johns. 395
    • Scott v. Stansfield (1868) L. R. 3 Ex. 220
    • Alzua v. Johnson (1913) 231 U. S. 106, 34 Sup. Ct. 27
    • Fraser, Libel and Slander (5th ed.) 183
  • 2
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Chatterton v. Secretary of State for India (1895) 2Q. B.189
    • Spalding v. Vilas (1896) 161 U. S. 483, 16 Sup. Ct. 631
    • DeArnaud v. Ainsworth (1904) 24 App. D. C. 167
    • Fraser, Libel and Slander (5th ed&) 191
  • 3
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Coffin v. Coffin (1808) 4 Mass. 1
    • Kilbourn v. Thompson (1880) 103 U. S. 168
    • Fraser, Libel and Slander (5th ed.) 182
  • 4
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Channell, J., in Bottomley v. Brougham (1908) 1 K. B. 584 at p. 587
    • Munster v. Lamb (1883) 11Q. B. Div.588, 607
    • Burr v. Smith (1909) 2 K. B. 306
  • 5
    This reference contains 20 citations:
    • Blakeslee v. Carroll (1894) 64 Conn. 223, 29 Atl. 473
    • Andrews v. Gardiner (1918) 224 N. Y. 440, 121 N. E. 341
    • Seaman v. Netherclift (1876) 2 C. P. Div. 53
    • Munster v. Lamb (1883) 11Q. B. Div.588
    • Sebree v. Thompson (1907) 126 Ky. 223, 103 S. W. 374
    • Yancey v. Commonwealth (1909) 135 Ky. 207, 122 S. W. 123
    • Hunckel v. Voneiff (1888) 69 Md. 179, 14 Atl. 500
    • Andrews v. Gardiner, supra
    • Gilbert v. The People (N. Y. 1845) 1 Denio 41
    • White v. Carroll (1870) 42 N. Y. 161
    • Wright v. Lothrop (1889) 149 Mass. 385
    • Myers v. IXodges (1907) 53 Fla. 197, 44 So. 357
    • Keeley v. Great Northern R. Co. (1914) 156 Wis. 181, 145 N. W. 664
    • Royal Aquarium Society v. Parkinson (1892) 1Q. B.431
    • Callahan v. Ingram (1894) 122 Mo. 355, 26 S. W. 1020
    • Greenwood v. Cobbey (1889) 26 Neb. 449, 42 N. W. 413
    • McGaw%v v. Hamilton (1898) 184 Pa. 108, 39 Atl. 4
    • Tribilcock v. Anderson (1898) 117 Mich. 39, 75 N. W. 129
    • 9Columbia Law Rev.463, 600
    • 10Columbia Law Rev.131
  • 6
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Odgers, Libel and Slander (5th ed.) 227
    • Fraser, Libel and Slander (5th ed.) 253
    • Newell, Slander and Libel (3rd ed.) 476
  • 7
    This reference contains 5 citations:
    • Clark v. Molyneux (1877) 3Q. B. Div.237
    • Barry v. McCollom (1908) 81 Conn. 293, 70 Atl. 1035
    • Henunens vt Nelson (1893i) 138 N. Y. 517, 34 N. E. 342
    • Bays v. Hunt (1882) 60 Iow%a 251, 14 N. W. 785
    • Pollock, Lawv of Torts (1th ed.) 288
  • 8
    This reference contains 6 citations:
    • Carpenter v. Bailey (1873) 53 N. H. 590
    • Ranson v. West (1907) 125 Ky. 457, 101 S. W. 885
    • Toothaker v. Conant (1899) 91 Me. 438, 40 Atl. 331
    • Conroy 'z. Pittsburg Times (1891) 139 Pa. St. 334, 21 Atl. 154
    • Muldenig v. Wilkes Barre Times (1906) 215 Pa. 470, 64 Atl. 636
    • Douglass v. Daisley (C. C. A. 1902) 114 Fed. 628
  • 9
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Wason v. Walter (1868) L. R. 4 Q. B. 73
    • § 1907 N. Y. Code Civ. Proc
  • 10
    This reference contains 7 citations:
    • Ryalls v. Leader (1866) L. R. 1 Ex. 296
    • Usill v. Hales (1878) 3 Comm. Pleas Div. Rep. 319
    • Lee v. Brooklyn Union Pub. Co. (1913) 209 N. Y. 245, 103 N. E. 155
    • Per Lawrence, J. in King v. Wright (1799) 8 T. R. 293
    • Kimball v. Post Publishing Co. (1908) 199 Mass. 248, 85 N. E. 103
    • Williams v. New York Herald (1914) 165 App. Div. 529
    • Metcalf vx Times Publishing Company (1898)) 20 R. I. 674, 40 Atl. 864
  • 11
    This reference contains 6 citations:
    • Barrows v. Bell (1856) 73 Mass. 301
    • Meteye v. Times-Democrat Pub. Co. (1895) 47 La. Ann. 824, 17 So. 314
    • Trebby v. Transcript Pub. Co. (1898) 74 Minn. 84, 76 N. W. 961
    • Buckstaff v. Hicks (189$) 94 Wis. 34, 68 N. W. 403
    • Purcell v. Sowler (1877) 3 Comm. Pleas Div. Rep. 215
    • St. 51 & 52 Vict. c. 64, sec. 4
  • 12
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Fraser, Libel and Slander (5th ed.) 176
    • Ogders, Libel and Slander (5th ed.) 249
    • Newell, Slander and Libel (3rd ed.) 574
  • 13
    Fraser, Libel and Slander (5th ed.) 177
  • 14
    Jeremiah Smith, 14Columbia Law Rev.185, 296
  • 15
    Baron Parke in Toogood v. Spyring (1834) 1 C. M. & R. *181, at p. 193.
  • 16
    Per Erle, C. J. in Whiteley v. Adams (1863) 15 C. B. (N. S.) 392, at p. 418
  • 17
    This reference contains 5 citations:
    • Trade v. Greenlands, Limited, (1916) 2 A. C. 15
    • Parke, B. in Toogood v. Spyring [1 C. M. & R. 181, 193]
    • Erle C. J. in Whiteley v. Adams [15 0. B. (N. S.) 392, 414]
    • Lord Campbell in Harrison v. Bush [5 E. & B. 344]
    • Stuart v. Bell [(1891) 2Q. B.341, 347]
  • 18
    (1855) 5 E. & B. 344.
  • 19
    1846) 2 C. B. 569.
  • 20
    London Association for Protection of Trade v. Greenlands, Ltd. (1916) 2 A. C. 15, at p. 22.
  • 21
    Parke, B. in Toogood v. Spyring, (1834) 1 C. M. & R. 181, at p. 193
  • 22
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Morse v. Times Republican Printing Co. (1904) 124 Iowa 707, 100 N. W. 867
    • Barnes v. Campbell (1879) 59 N. H. 128
    • Ogren v. Rockfort Star Printing Co. (Ill. 1919) 123 N. E. 527
  • 23
    Ashcroft v. Hammond (1910) 197 N. Y. 438, 90 N. E. 1117
  • 24
    20 Columbia Law Rev.30
  • 25
    (1891) L. R. 1 Q. B. 524.
  • 26
    (1869) L. R. 4 Q. B. 262.
  • 27
    Odgers, Libel and Slander (5th ed.) 303.
  • 28
    (1894) 1Q. B.842.
  • 29
    (1907) 1 K. B. 371.
  • 30
    Ibid., at p. 382.
  • 31
    This reference contains 8 citations:
    • Owen v. Ogilvie Publishing Co. (1898) 32 App. Div. 465, 53 N. Y. Supp. 1033
    • Bohlinger v. Germania Life Ins. Co. (1911) 100 Ark. 477, 140 S. W. 257
    • Central of Georgia Ry. v. Jones (1916) 18 Ga. App. 414, 89 S. E. 429
    • Cartwright-Caps Co. v. Fischel & Kaufman (1917) 113 Miss. 359, 74 So. 278
    • Prins v. Holland-North American Mtge. Co. (Wash. 1919) 181 Pac. 680
    • 20Columbia Law Rev.30.
    • Gambrill v. Schooley (1901) 93 Md. 48, 48 Atl. 730
    • Ferdon v. Dickens (1909) 161 Ala. 181, 49 So. 888
  • 32
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Jeffras v. McKillop (1874) 4 N. Y. Sup. Ct. Rep. (T. & C.) 578.
    • Lopes, L. J., in Edmondson v. Birch & Co. (1907) 1 K. B. 371, at p. 380
    • Cullen, CIL J. in Ashcroft v. Hammond (1910) 197 N. Y. 488, at p. 495, 90 N. E. 1117
    • Lochren, J. in Nye v. Western Union Tel. Co. (C. C. A. 1900) 104 Fed. 628, at p. 630.
  • 33
    Williamson v. Freer (1874) L. R. 9 C. P. 393.
  • 35
    (1897) 153 N. Y. 214, 47 N. E. 265.
  • 36
    Ibid., at p. 222. Italics ours.
  • 37
    (1917) A. C. 309.
  • 38
    Ibid., at p. 340, 341. Italics ours.
  • 39
    Ibid.. at p. 331. Italics ours.
  • 40
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Nye v. Western Union Tel. Co. (1900) 104 Fed. 628, at page 630, Lochren, J.
    • Western Union Telegraph Company zs Cashman (C. C. A. 1906) 149 Fed. 367, at page 371, Pardee, J.
    • Wyman, Public Service Corporations, § 605
  • 41
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Nye v. Western Union Telegraph Co. (1900) 104 Fed. 628
    • Ibid., at p. 631
  • 42
    (1894) 2Q. B.54.
  • 43
    Ibid., at p. 59.
  • 44
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • (1888) 111 N. Y. 143
    • "The Count Joannes" v. Bennett (Mass. 1862) 5 Allen 169. Accord
  • 45
    This reference contains 6 citations:
    • Ormsby v. Douglass (1868) 37 N. Y. 477
    • Johnson v. Brad- street (186) 77 Ga. 172
    • MacIntosh '. Dunn (1908) A. C. 390
    • London Ass'n. v. Greenlands (1916) 2 A. C. 15
    • 29Harvard Law Rev.786
    • Jeremiah Smith on "Conditional Privilege for Mercantile Agencies," 14Columbia Law Rev. 187, 296
  • 46
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Sunderlin v. Bradstreet (1871) 46 N. Y. 188
    • King v. Patterson (1887) 49 N. J. L. 417
  • 47
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Sunderlin v. Bradstreet, sutpra
    • King v. Patterson, sitpra
  • 48
    S1upra, footnote 46.
  • 49
    Ibid., at p. 192. Italics ours.
  • 50
    (1916) 2 A. C. 15.
  • 51
    Ibid., at p. 35.
  • 52
    sutpra
  • 53
    (1913) 3 K. B. 764.
  • 54
    (Minn. 1919) 170 N. W. 511.
  • 55
    20Columbia Law Rev.30.
  • 56
    (1896) 65 Minn. 18, 67 N. Wt. 646.
  • 57
    Ibid., at p. 22.
  • 58
    !bid., at p. 23. Italics ours.
  • 59
    (1898) 72 Minn. 41, 74 N. W. 1022.
  • 60
    (1899) 75 Minn. 368, 77 N. W. 985.
  • 61
    Lord Bramwell in Abrath v. North Eastern Rail. Co. (1886) 11 A. C. 253.
  • 62
    This reference contains 6 citations:
    • Bromage v. Prosser (1825) 4 B. & C. 247
    • White v. Nicholls (1845) 3 How. 266
    • King v. Patterson (1887) 49N. J. L.417
    • Sunderlin v. Brad- street (1871) 46 N. Y. 188
    • Morse v. Times Printing Co. (1904) 124 Iowa 707, 100 N. W. 867
    • Odgers, Libel and Slander (5th ed.) 4
  • 63
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Jenoure v. Delmege (1891) A. C. 73
    • Klinck v. Colby (1871) 46 N. Y. 427
    • Ashcroft v. Hammond (1910) 197 N. Y. 488, 90 N. E. 1117
    • Fraser, Libel and Slander (4th ed.) 253
  • 64
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Hulton v. Jones (1910) A. C. 20
    • Moore v. Francis (1890) 121 N. Y. 199, 23 N. E. 1127
  • 65
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Cohalan v. New York Press Co. (1914) 212 N. Y. 344, 106 N. E. 115
    • Odgers, Libel and Slander (5th ed.) 398
  • 66
    (1900) 104 Fed. 628.
  • 67
    Ibid., at p. 630. Italics ours.
  • 68
    1Columbia Law Rev.131.
  • 71
    (1906) 149 Fed. 367.
  • 72
    Ibid., at p. 371. Italics ours.
  • 73
    footnotes 61, 62, 64, szcpra.
  • 74
    footnote 63, srpra.
  • 75
    20 Columbia Law Rev.30
  • 76
    Bronson, C. J. in Washburn v. Cooke (N. Y. 1846) 3 Denio 110
  • 77
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Grisham v. Telegraph Co. (1911) 238 Mo. 480
    • Stockman v. Telegraph Co. (Kan. 1900) 63 Pac. 658
    • 20Columbia Law Rev.30, at p. 49
    • Monson v. Lathrop (1897) 96 Wis. 386
  • 78
    This reference contains 5 citations:
    • Whitfield v. South Eastern Railway Co. (1858) Ellis B. & C. 115
    • Great N. W. Tel. Co. zv. Archambault (1886) 30 Lower Can. Jur. 221
    • 14Quebec L. R.8
    • Dominion Telegraph Co. v. Silver (1881) 10 Can. S. C. 238
    • Ritchie, C. J. remarked (p. 261 )
  • 79
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • (Minn. 1919) 170 N. W. 511
    • 5Iowa Law Bulletin119
  • 80
    (1913) 3 K. B. 764.
  • 81
    Lord Atkinson on p. 382, supra.
  • 82
    p. 381, stupra
  • 83
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • cited in footnote 7, stpra
    • footnote 8, supra