Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Is the Eighteenth Amendment Void because of Its Contents?

D. O. McGovney
Columbia Law Review
Vol. 20, No. 5 (May, 1920), pp. 499-518
DOI: 10.2307/1112653
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1112653
Page Count: 20
Subjects: Law
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
Is the Eighteenth Amendment Void because of Its Contents?
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 43 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Congressional Globe, 40th Cong., 3rd Sess., 705 et seq.
    • Ibid., Appendix, 151
  • 2
    23Harvard Law Rev.169, esp. pp. 170-171
  • 3
    William L. Marbury, The Limitations Upon the Amending Power, 33 Harvard Law Rev.223.
  • 4
    Ibid., p. 235.
  • 5
    5Cornell Law Quarterly113.
  • 7
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Act of Congress, July 27, 1868, 15 Stat. 223. Rev. Stat. §§ 1999, 2000, 2001
    • 3 Moore, International Law Digest, 579 if.
  • 8
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • D. 0. McGovney, The Webb-Kenyon Law and Beyond, 3Iowa Law Bulletin, 145
    • Charles H. Safely, Growth of State Power Under Federal Constitution to Regulate Traffic in Intoxicating Liquors, 3Iowa Law Bulletin, 221.
  • 9
    5Cornell Law Quarterly, 113-114.
  • 11
    I Commentaries on the Constitution (5th ed.) §§ 207 ff.
  • 12
    2 Elliotes Debates 424.
  • 13
    (1793) 2 Dall (2 U. S.) -419, 462.
  • 14
    Ibid., p. 463.
  • 15
    Ibid., p. 454.
  • 16
    2 Elliot's Debates 434-435.
  • 17
    (1793) 2 Dall (2 U. S.) 470-471.
  • 18
    Ibid., p. 471.
  • 19
    Cohens v. Virginia (1821) 6 Wheat. (19 U. S.) 264, 381.
  • 20
    McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) 4 Wheat. (17 U. S.) 316, 403.
  • 21
    Cohens v. Virginia (1821) 6 Wheat. (19 U. S.) 264, 381.
  • 22
    Ibid., p 389.
  • 24
    Ibid., p. 229, 232.
  • 25
    (1871) 13 Wall. (80 U. S.) 646, 650.
  • 26
    (1878) 97 U. S. 454, 476.
  • 27
    (1907) 206 U. S. 46, 90.
  • 28
    2 Elliot's Debates, 443-444.
  • 29
    4 Elliot's Debates, 177.
  • 30
    bid., p. 176-177.
  • 31
    3 Elliot's Debates, 49-50.
  • 32
    Ibid., p. 94.
  • 33
    2 Farrand 629
  • 34
    4 Elliot's Debates, 23.
  • 35
    2 Farrand, 649.
  • 36
    (1824) 9 Wheat. (22 U. S.) 1, 191.
  • 37
    2 Farrand's Records of the Federal Convention, p. 630.
  • 38
    4 Elliott's Debates, 207.
  • 39
    3 Farrand, p. 630.
  • 40
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • 2 Farrand, p. 136
    • 3 Ibid., 595, 609.
  • 41
    2 Farrand, p. 84.
  • 42
    2 Farrand, p. 188.
  • 43
    2 Farrand, p. 467468.
  • 44
    2 Farrand, pp. 557-558.
  • 45
    2 Farrand, p. 559.
  • 46
    2 Farrand, pp. 629-631.