You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Invisible Barbecue
Columbia Law Review
Vol. 97, No. 4 (May, 1997), pp. 945-954
Published by: Columbia Law Review Association, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1123312
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Broadcasting, Barbecues, Telecommunications, News content, Political corruption, High definition television, Television broadcasting, Emerging technology, Legislators, Broadcasting industry
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Past legislation subsidizing the development of infrastructural technology has borne the mark of political corruption. The subject matter of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 falls within the same category of legislation that has fallen prey to this process in the past. In an effort to discern whether such forces are at work today, Professor Moglen undertakes a critical examination of the metaphors that pervade the current scholarly discourse on the subject of telecommunications law. Terms such as "Superhighway," "Broadcasting," and "Market for Eyeballs" reveal a great deal about the implicit assumptions at work behind the current scholarship and legislation, and serve to confine the debate in such a way that the full impact of the new law remains hidden. Professor Moglen concludes that the broader implications of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 need to be addressed, or the law will have a detrimental impact on our society and culture for decades to come.
Columbia Law Review © 1997 Columbia Law Review Association, Inc.