You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Achievement Standards for Contingent Self-Reinforcement: Effects of Task Length and Task Difficulty
John C. Masters and Monica D. Christy
Vol. 45, No. 1 (Mar., 1974), pp. 6-13
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1127744
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Children, Arithmetic, Child development, Socialization, Child psychology, Social psychology, Banduras, Personality psychology, Analysis of variance, Estimate reliability
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
It was hypothesized that socialization within an achievement-oriented culture would encourage children to adjust the amount of contingent self-reward according to the length and difficulty of a task. Second-grade children completed long-easy, long-difficult, short-easy, and short-difficult versions of 3 tasks and set their own amount of reward following each. Long tasks were judged to merit greater amounts of reward than shorter ones, but the effect of difficulty varied across tasks. It is proposed that an additional factor, namely, the quality or accuracy of performance, was also governing level of self-reward. Individual differences in amount of self-reward were consistent across tasks.
Child Development © 1974 Society for Research in Child Development