You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Sibling Deidentification Judged by Mothers: Cross-Validation and Developmental Studies
Frances Fuchs Schachter, Gabi Gilutz, Ellen Shore and Michelle Adler
Vol. 49, No. 2 (Jun., 1978), pp. 543-546
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1128728
Page Count: 4
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
A previous study of sibling deidentification in undergraduates was cross-validated on a new population, mothers judging pairs of their own children; at a new age level, averaging 6.4 years; and using same-opposite as well as alike-different judgments. The design also included a developmental study. Judgments of 95 mothers with 2 children and 45 with 3 cross-validate previous findings. (1) Percentage deidentification was significantly higher for first pairs (first 2 children) than jump pairs (first and third children), with intermediate levels for second pairs (second and third children). (2) Deidentification was higher for same-than opposite-sex siblings among first pairs. (3) Global judgments covary with semantic differential polarization scores. Developmental analysis indicates a linear increment until age 6, when deidentification stabilizes at extremely high levels for first pairs. Opposite and different judgments covary. Results support the hypothesis that deidentification is a defense against sibling rivalry, although an alternative explanation, that mothers impose deidentification on their children, merits consideration.
Child Development © 1978 Society for Research in Child Development