You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Judging Others Who Hold Opposite Beliefs: The Development of Belief-Discrepancy Reasoning
Robert D. Enright and Daniel K. Lapsley
Vol. 52, No. 3 (Sep., 1981), pp. 1053-1063
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1129111
Page Count: 11
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Subjects' judgments of intolerance toward disagreeing others were examined developmentally in 3 studies. A developmental progression emerged as follows: level 0 = failure to understand that one can judge another's beliefs in relation to the self's, level 1 = rejecting others who disagree with the self, level 2 = tolerance toward disagreeing others, and level 3 = a willingness with more knowledge of the other's beliefs to judge the other in relation to his or her beliefs. In study 1, the belief-discrepancy construct was explored through an open-ended, clinical interview with third, seventh, and twelfth graders. In study 2 an objective measure of the construct was related significantly to moral judgment in samples of ninth and twelfth graders, college students, and adults. In study 3, a different objective measure of the belief-discrepancy construct was significantly related to Piagetian logical reasoning in first, fourth, seventh, and tenth graders and college students. The evidence suggests that intolerance may be a lower level of reasoning in a social cognitive developmental progression.
Child Development © 1981 Society for Research in Child Development