You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Cross-Cultural Patterns of Attachment: A Meta-Analysis of the Strange Situation
Marinus H. van IJzendoorn and Pieter M. Kroonenberg
Vol. 59, No. 1 (Feb., 1988), pp. 147-156
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1130396
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Child development, Infants, Attachment behavior, Information classification, Standard deviation, Mothers, Cross cultural studies, Child psychology, Cross cultural differences, Cognitive psychology
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Cross-cultural research using Ainsworth's Strange Situation tends to rely on incomplete information and to concentrate on individual rather than aggregated samples. In this study, a wider perspective is taken by examining almost 2,000 Strange Situation classifications obtained in 8 different countries. Differences and similarities between distributions in classifications of samples are investigated using correspondence analysis. Aggregation of samples per country and continent allowed for a firmer empirical basis for cross-cultural analysis. Substantial intracultural differences were established; in a number of instances, samples from 1 country resembled those in other countries more than they did each other. The data also suggest a pattern of cross-cultural differences, in which A classifications emerge as relatively more prevalent in Western European countries and C classifications as relatively more frequent in Israel and Japan. Intracultural variation was nearly 1.5 times the cross-cultural variation.
Child Development © 1988 Society for Research in Child Development