Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Modeling IQ Change: Evidence from the Texas Adoption Project

John C. Loehlin, Joseph M. Horn and Lee Willerman
Child Development
Vol. 60, No. 4 (Aug., 1989), pp. 993-1004
Published by: Wiley on behalf of the Society for Research in Child Development
DOI: 10.2307/1131039
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1131039
Page Count: 12
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($34.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Modeling IQ Change: Evidence from the Texas Adoption Project
Preview not available

Abstract

An analysis of genetic and environmental contributions to intellectual change was carried out by means of a path model applied to IQ data from the Texas Adoption Project, an adoption study in which children were measured on 2 occasions approximately 10 years apart. Included in the model were assortative mating, selective placement, genotype-environment correlation, a measure of socioeconomic status, and alternative hypotheses about cross-generation environmental transmission and the persistence of a trait over time. Some form of environmental transmission across generations was necessary, but either of the 2 forms tested was sufficient. The data were best fit by considering persistence over time to occur at the level of the developed trait. The effect of both genes and family environment was significant at the time of the first measurement, but only the genes made an additional contribution between the first and the second, suggesting the necessity of revising some popular stereotypes about development.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[993]
    [993]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
994
    994
  • Thumbnail: Page 
995
    995
  • Thumbnail: Page 
996
    996
  • Thumbnail: Page 
997
    997
  • Thumbnail: Page 
998
    998
  • Thumbnail: Page 
999
    999
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1000
    1000
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1001
    1001
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1002
    1002
  • Thumbnail: Page 
[1003]
    [1003]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1004
    1004