You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Not Proved: Reply to Wynn
Ann Wakeley, Susan Rivera and Jonas Langer
Vol. 71, No. 6 (Nov. - Dec., 2000), pp. 1537-1539
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1132496
Page Count: 3
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Infants, Addition, Child development, Arithmetic, Experimentation, Infancy, Childhood
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Findings on whether young infants look longer at incorrect addition and subtraction have been inconsistent or, as in our study, negative. We hypothesize that imprecise ordinal calculating with very small numbers of objects develops in late infancy and precise calculating in early childhood.
Child Development © 2000 Society for Research in Child Development