Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:

login

Log in through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Journal Article

Not Proved: Reply to Wynn

Ann Wakeley, Susan Rivera and Jonas Langer
Child Development
Vol. 71, No. 6 (Nov. - Dec., 2000), pp. 1537-1539
Published by: Wiley on behalf of the Society for Research in Child Development
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1132496
Page Count: 3

You can always find the topics here!

Topics: Infants, Addition, Child development, Arithmetic, Experimentation, Infancy, Childhood
Were these topics helpful?
See something inaccurate? Let us know!

Select the topics that are inaccurate.

Cancel
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($34.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Not Proved: Reply to Wynn
Preview not available

Abstract

Findings on whether young infants look longer at incorrect addition and subtraction have been inconsistent or, as in our study, negative. We hypothesize that imprecise ordinal calculating with very small numbers of objects develops in late infancy and precise calculating in early childhood.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[1537]
    [1537]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1538
    1538
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1539
    1539