You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Diazepam and (-)-pentobarbital: Fluctuation Analysis Reveals Different Mechanisms for Potentiation of γ -aminobutyric Acid Responses in Cultured Central Neurons
Robert E. Study and Jeffery L. Barker
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Vol. 78, No. 11, [Part 2: Biological Sciences] (Nov., 1981), pp. 7180-7184
Published by: National Academy of Sciences
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/11434
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Neurons, Electric current, Kinetics, Pipettes, Statistical variance, Spectral energy distribution, Neurobiology, Chlorides, Ion channels, Cell membranes
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Diazepam and (-)-pentobarbital each potentiate the increase in chloride ion conductance produced by γ -aminobutyric acid (GABA) in voltage-clamped mouse spinal neurons grown in culture. Fluctuation analysis was used to compare the properties of elementary ion-channel events underlying the chloride conductance produced by GABA alone and during potentiation by the two drugs. Neither drug altered the conductance of an open ion channel, but both drugs affected the kinetics of channel activity. Diazepam increased the frequency of channel openings and either did not affect or slightly increased the average open-channel lifetime, whereas (-)-pentobarbital decreased the frequency of channel openings and increased average open-channel lifetime. These changes in the kinetics of GABA-activated ion channels can quantitatively account for the potentiation of GABA responses observed with the drugs. Thus, the drugs each increase the response to GABA but do not act on channel kinetics in the same manner.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America © 1981 National Academy of Sciences