Access
You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen Reader
This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.Journal Article
Advocacy Research and Social Policy
Neil Gilbert
Crime and Justice
Vol. 22 (1997), pp. 101-148
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1147572
Page Count: 48
You can always find the topics here!
Topics: Sexual assault, Child molestation, Violence against women, Rape, Kidnapping, Date rape, Crime victims, Poverty, Men, College students
Were these topics helpful?
See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
- Item Type
- Article
- Thumbnails
- References
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Your search terms occurs
189
times in this item.
View Results
Abstract
Advocacy research-empirical investigations of social problems by people who are deeply concerned about those problems-has a long and honorable history, exemplified by the considerable influence of Michael Harrington's The Other America on federal antipoverty policies in the 1960s. Often, however, perhaps for understandable psychological reasons, advocacy has taken precedence to research, and results have been exaggerated or magnified. Claims in the 1980s, later irrefutably debunked, that 50,000 children are kidnapped each year by strangers, are one example. Other recent examples include wildly inflated estimates of the incidence of abuse of the elderly, sexual abuse of children, and rape. Exaggerated claims are eventually exposed but, when they deal with highly emotional subjects, can for a time powerfully shape media coverage and social policy. The trick-easier to say than do, but Harrington did it-is to be cautious and modest in making empirical claims and passionate and personal in expressing policy views.
Page Thumbnails
-
101
-
102
-
103
-
104
-
105
-
106
-
107
-
108
-
109
-
110
-
111
-
112
-
113
-
114
-
115
-
116
-
117
-
118
-
119
-
120
-
121
-
122
-
123
-
124
-
125
-
126
-
127
-
128
-
129
-
130
-
131
-
132
-
133
-
134
-
135
-
136
-
137
-
138
-
139
-
140
-
141
-
142
-
143
-
144
-
145
-
146
-
147
-
148
Crime and Justice © 1997 University of Chicago