You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
An Evaluation of Rosenthal and Rubin's Binomial Effect Size Display
Kenneth N. Thompson and Randall E. Schumacker
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
Vol. 22, No. 1 (Spring, 1997), pp. 109-117
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1165240
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Binomials, Control groups, Personnel evaluation, T tests, Placebos, Educational research, Degrees of freedom, Psychology, Social psychology, Educational evaluation
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The binomial effect size display (BESD) has been proposed by Rosenthal and Rubin (1979, 1982; Rosenthal, 1990; Rosenthal & Rosnow, 1991) as a format for presenting effect sizes associated with certain experimental and nonexperimental research. An evaluation of the BESD suggests that its application is limited to presenting the results of 2 × 2 tables where φ is employed as the index of effect size. Findings indicate that the BESD provides little added information beyond an examination of the raw percentages in the 2 × 2 table and dramatically distorts effect sizes when binomial success rates vary from .50.
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics © 1997 American Educational Research Association