You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Multiple Orientations for the Conduct of Marketing Research: An Analysis of the Academic/Practitioner Distinction
David Brinberg and Elizabeth C. Hirschman
Journal of Marketing
Vol. 50, No. 4 (Oct., 1986), pp. 161-173
Published by: American Marketing Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1251293
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Marketing, Consumer research, Research methods, Observational research, Customer satisfaction, Modeling, Cognitive models, Research design, Mathematical sets, Consumer behavior
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
A distinction often is made in marketing between academic and practitioner-oriented research. That distinction has been used to justify one type of research by highlighting the limitations of the other. The authors use a validity network schema developed by Brinberg and McGrath to characterize academic and practitioner orientations in research. Three extended examples (research using the Fishbein theory of reasoned action, causal modeling, and consumer satisfaction/complaining behavior) illustrate the use of both academic and practitioner orientations. The authors argue that both are necessary for understanding marketing problems.
Journal of Marketing © 1986 American Marketing Association