You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Managerial Representations of Competitive Advantage
George S. Day and Prakash Nedungadi
Journal of Marketing
Vol. 58, No. 2 (Apr., 1994), pp. 31-44
Published by: American Marketing Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1252267
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Customers, Marketing, Corporate strategies, Marketing strategies, Industrial management, Financial management, Cognitive models, Business management, Questionnaires, Marketing management
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Managers use mental models of markets to simplify and impose order on complex and ambiguous competitive environments and isolate points of competitive advantage or deficiency. In this study of senior managers of 190 businesses, the authors found four different types of mental models or representations of competitive advantage, varying in the emphasis placed on customer or management judgments about where and how competitors differ. These representations were influenced equally by pressure points in the environment and choice of strategy. The type of representation was also strongly associated with constrained patterns of information search and usage, raising the possibility that the necessary simplifications and narrowing of perspective may come at the cost of myopia and insensitivity to challenges from unexpected directions. There was also a strong association between the completeness of the managerial representation and relative financial performance, which supports related studies on the profitability of a market orientation.
Journal of Marketing © 1994 American Marketing Association