You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Dryden's "The Hind and the Panther" and Roman Catholic Apologetics
Victor M. Hamm
Vol. 83, No. 2 (May, 1968), pp. 400-415
Published by: Modern Language Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1261194
Page Count: 16
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
A mass of now forgotten Roman Catholic apologetic and controversial writings appeared in English during Dryden's lifetime. Study reveals the fact that Dryden was acquainted with some of the most notable of these, particularly Hugh Cressy's Exomologesis (1647, 1653), Rushworth-White's Dialogues (1654), John Sergeant's Schisme Dis-Arm'd (1655) and Sure-Footing in Christianity (1665), Edward Worsley's Protestancy Without Principles (1668), and Abraham Woodhead's Rational Account (1673), as well as with the principal Anglican publications of the day (especially those of Stillingfleet and Tillotson). Dryden used the arguments, sometimes the very phraseology, of these and other writings in his poem. "The Hind and the Panther" thus justifies Charles E. Ward's judgment that the poet's conversion was "a result of long thought and long study of the problems of faith," and takes its place in the Catholic-Anglican controversy of the age.
PMLA © 1968 Modern Language Association